The Body Keeps the Score: How Trauma Rewrites Your Biological Operating System

Language: en

Bessel van der Kolk and the Revolution in Trauma Science

In 1994, a Dutch-born psychiatrist at Boston University named Bessel van der Kolk slid a patient into a neuroimaging scanner and asked her to recall the moment she had been raped. What appeared on the screen would upend a century of psychiatric thinking and launch a revolution that is still unfolding today.

The brain scan showed something that talk therapy could never reveal. When the traumatized woman relived her assault, Broca’s area — the brain region responsible for speech and language — went dark. Simultaneously, the amygdala, the brain’s smoke detector for threat, lit up like a house fire. And the medial prefrontal cortex, the brain region responsible for self-awareness and time orientation — the part that tells you “this happened in the past, you are safe now” — deactivated entirely.

In a single image, van der Kolk could see why his patients struggled so profoundly. Trauma was not a story stored in language. It was a physiological state stored in the body. And the brain structures that would allow a person to narrate, contextualize, and resolve that experience were precisely the ones that went offline during traumatic recall.

This was the foundational insight behind van der Kolk’s magnum opus, The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma, published in 2014 and eventually spending years on the New York Times bestseller list. The book synthesized forty years of clinical work, neuroscience research, and a radical argument: trauma is not primarily a psychological problem. It is a physiological one. And solving it requires working with the body, not just the mind.

The Trauma Hard Drive: How the Body Stores What the Mind Cannot Process

To understand van der Kolk’s contribution, you need to understand what trauma actually does to the brain and body — not metaphorically, but in terms of hardware architecture.

The human nervous system processes experience through a hierarchy of brain structures. Sensory information enters through the thalamus, which acts as a relay station — a router in network engineering terms. From the thalamus, signals flow to two destinations simultaneously: the amygdala (fast, unconscious threat assessment) and the prefrontal cortex (slow, conscious evaluation).

Under normal conditions, the prefrontal cortex — particularly the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) — acts as the executive manager. It contextualizes incoming information, compares it to past experience, assigns meaning, and generates an appropriate response. When something frightening happens but resolves safely, the mPFC stamps the memory with a timestamp: “This happened then. It is over. You survived.” The hippocampus, the brain’s librarian, files it into autobiographical memory with proper context.

Trauma disrupts this entire pipeline.

When the survival threat exceeds the system’s processing capacity, the prefrontal cortex goes offline. The system shifts to emergency mode: the amygdala takes command, the sympathetic nervous system floods the body with adrenaline and cortisol, and the hippocampus — overwhelmed by stress hormones — fails to properly encode the experience into narrative memory.

The result is a memory that is never properly filed. It exists as fragmented sensory and emotional data — sounds, smells, body sensations, visual flashes, waves of terror — without a coherent narrative wrapper. It has no timestamp. The hippocampus never got to stamp it with “this is over.” So the body continues to respond as if the trauma is happening right now.

This is what van der Kolk means when he says the body keeps the score. The traumatic experience is not stored in the part of the brain that handles stories and language. It is stored in the part of the brain that handles raw sensation and survival. It is written into the body’s firmware — the autonomic nervous system, the musculoskeletal system, the visceral organs — in a format that language cannot access.

Think of it in computing terms. Normal memories are stored as structured data in a relational database — indexed, searchable, retrievable in narrative form. Traumatic memories are stored as raw binary in the body’s BIOS — fragmentary, non-verbal, triggerable by sensory pattern-matching but invisible to the conscious mind’s query language.

This is why a combat veteran can know intellectually that he is safe in his living room, yet his body throws him to the floor when a car backfires. The sound pattern matches the sensory fragment stored in the amygdala. The amygdala fires before the cortex can intervene. The body responds to the original threat. The conscious mind is the last to know.

The Neuroimaging Evidence: Seeing Trauma in the Brain

Van der Kolk’s neuroimaging work, conducted with Scott Rauch at Massachusetts General Hospital and later expanded by numerous research groups worldwide, produced a consistent pattern across traumatized populations. Whether the trauma was combat, sexual assault, childhood abuse, or accidents, the brain scans told the same story.

Broca’s Area Deactivation. Broca’s area, located in the left inferior frontal gyrus, is essential for putting feelings and experiences into words. When traumatic memories are activated, Broca’s area goes quiet. This is the neuroscience behind the common clinical observation that traumatized people become literally speechless when triggered. They cannot describe what is happening to them because the hardware that generates speech has shut down. “Trauma lives in a part of the brain that has no language,” van der Kolk writes.

Amygdala Hyperactivation. The amygdala, the brain’s threat detection center, shows dramatically increased activation during traumatic recall. In non-traumatized individuals, the amygdala responds proportionally to actual threat and is modulated by cortical input. In traumatized individuals, the amygdala fires excessively at stimuli that merely resemble the original threat — a phenomenon called fear generalization. The smoke detector has lost its calibration. It now responds to toast as if the house were burning down.

Medial Prefrontal Cortex Deactivation. The mPFC serves as the amygdala’s counterbalance. It provides top-down regulation, essentially telling the amygdala, “Stand down — this is not an actual threat.” In traumatized brains, the mPFC shows reduced activation during triggering events. The executive override is offline. There is no one in the control tower to tell the amygdala to stand down.

Right Hemisphere Dominance. Van der Kolk’s imaging also showed that traumatic recall activates the right hemisphere disproportionately. The right hemisphere processes emotional, spatial, somatic, and nonverbal information. The left hemisphere processes language, logic, sequence, and narrative. Trauma literally shifts processing to the nonverbal brain. This is another reason talk therapy — which engages the left hemisphere’s language centers — has limited reach into traumatic material that lives in the right hemisphere’s somatic domain.

Altered Insula Activity. The insula, a brain region involved in interoception — the sensing of internal body states — shows dysregulation in traumatized individuals. Some show hyperactivation (overwhelming bodily awareness, hypervigilance to body sensations) while others show hypoactivation (numbing, dissociation, loss of body awareness). The body’s internal monitoring system is either screaming or muted — neither of which allows for healthy self-regulation.

Dissociation: The Emergency Shutdown Protocol

One of van der Kolk’s most important contributions was his detailed mapping of dissociation as a trauma response. Dissociation is the brain’s emergency shutdown protocol when fight and flight have both failed.

When a child is being abused by a caregiver — someone they depend on for survival — they cannot fight (too small) and cannot flee (nowhere to go). The nervous system deploys its last-resort survival strategy: disconnection from the body and the present moment. Consciousness fragments. The child “leaves” — not physically, but neurologically.

Van der Kolk and colleagues used neuroimaging to study dissociative responses and found a pattern distinct from the hyperarousal pattern. Dissociating subjects showed increased medial prefrontal cortex activity (but of a different quality — not healthy regulation, but excessive suppression of emotional processing), decreased amygdala activity, and reduced body awareness. The system was not flooding with alarm — it was shutting down.

In engineering terms, dissociation is a circuit breaker. When the current exceeds the system’s capacity, the breaker trips to prevent catastrophic damage. The experience is disconnected from conscious awareness. The person “goes away.” But the body continues to record. The sensory data, the autonomic responses, the muscular bracing patterns — all of it is written into the body’s firmware even while consciousness has departed.

This is why dissociative individuals often have no narrative memory of their trauma yet carry its signatures in chronic pain, autoimmune disorders, digestive problems, and postural patterns. The body kept the score even when consciousness checked out.

Ruth Lanius, a colleague of van der Kolk at Western University in Ontario, further delineated two subtypes of PTSD using neuroimaging: the hyperarousal subtype (amygdala dominant, flooding, flashbacks, panic) and the dissociative subtype (cortical suppression dominant, numbing, depersonalization, derealization). These represent two different failure modes of the same system — the alarm that will not turn off and the alarm that has been permanently disabled.

Developmental Trauma: When the Operating System Is Written in Fear

Van der Kolk’s most controversial and arguably most important contribution was his identification and advocacy for what he calls “developmental trauma disorder” — the distinct syndrome that results from chronic, early-life traumatic exposure.

The ACE study (detailed in a companion article) established the epidemiological link between childhood adversity and adult disease. Van der Kolk went further, describing the neurobiological mechanism by which early trauma literally shapes brain development.

The developing brain is an experience-dependent organ. Neural pathways that are repeatedly activated become strengthened (long-term potentiation). Pathways that are not used are pruned away (synaptic pruning). The brain of a child growing up in a safe, attuned environment develops robust prefrontal cortex connections, a well-calibrated amygdala, healthy interoception, and the capacity for emotional regulation.

The brain of a child growing up in a chaotic, abusive, or neglectful environment develops along an entirely different trajectory. The amygdala develops hyperactively, trained by repeated threat exposure. The prefrontal cortex — which does not fully mature until the mid-twenties — is under-stimulated because the child is chronically in survival mode rather than in the exploratory, playful states that build executive function. Stress hormones bathe the developing brain, altering the density and sensitivity of cortisol receptors. The default mode network — the brain’s self-referential processing system — develops in a fragmented or suppressed way, leading to disturbances in identity, self-perception, and the capacity for self-reflection.

In software engineering terms, childhood trauma does not just corrupt individual files — it corrupts the operating system during installation. The resulting adult does not simply have painful memories. They have a nervous system that was built for a world of danger. Their baseline stress activation is elevated. Their threat detection is hypervigilant. Their capacity for social engagement is impaired. Their body awareness is either overwhelming or absent. Their sense of self is fragmented.

This is fundamentally different from single-incident adult trauma, which corrupts specific memory files but leaves the operating system intact. Developmental trauma corrupts the operating system itself.

Van der Kolk spent over a decade lobbying the American Psychiatric Association to include developmental trauma disorder in the DSM-5. He was unsuccessful. The DSM committee chose to keep the single diagnosis of PTSD, which was designed around the experiences of adult combat veterans, not children growing up in chronically unsafe environments. Van der Kolk has called this “one of the great failures of modern psychiatry.”

Why Talk Therapy Alone Falls Short

Van der Kolk’s neuroimaging data led him to a clinical conclusion that remains controversial in some psychiatric circles but is increasingly accepted in the broader field: talk therapy alone cannot fully resolve trauma, because trauma is not primarily stored in the language-accessible regions of the brain.

Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), the gold standard of evidence-based psychotherapy, works by engaging the prefrontal cortex to reframe distorted thoughts and beliefs. It is effective for many conditions. But it operates through the very brain structures that go offline during traumatic activation. Asking a traumatized person to think their way out of a body-based survival response is like asking someone to debug their BIOS using a word processor. The tool does not match the task.

This is not to say that CBT is useless for trauma. Cognitive processing therapy (CPT) and prolonged exposure (PE) have genuine evidence bases. But van der Kolk argues that they address only the top-down cognitive layer of trauma and leave the bottom-up somatic layer largely untouched. A patient can cognitively understand that their abuser cannot hurt them anymore while their body continues to brace, their breath continues to constrict, and their autonomic nervous system continues to operate in survival mode.

Van der Kolk’s clinical work led him to advocate for body-based approaches: yoga, EMDR, neurofeedback, theater, martial arts, dance — modalities that engage the body, the right hemisphere, and the subcortical brain regions where traumatic material actually lives.

His research on yoga for PTSD, published in the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry in 2014, showed that a 10-week trauma-sensitive yoga program was significantly more effective than a well-established talk therapy (dialectical behavior therapy skills group) for women with treatment-resistant PTSD. The yoga group showed significant reductions in PTSD symptom severity, with some participants no longer meeting diagnostic criteria by the end of the study.

The mechanism is not mystical. Yoga engages interoception — the body’s internal sensing system. It asks practitioners to notice sensation without judgment, to tolerate discomfort, to regulate breathing, and to hold postures that challenge the body’s habitual bracing patterns. Over time, the traumatized individual begins to rebuild the relationship between body awareness and safety that was shattered by trauma. The insula begins to recalibrate. Interoception becomes a tool for self-regulation rather than a source of overwhelm.

Neurofeedback: Retraining the Brain’s Electrical Architecture

Van der Kolk became an advocate for neurofeedback — a modality that uses real-time EEG monitoring to train the brain to produce healthier electrical patterns. His research, published in NeuroImage: Clinical (2016), showed that neurofeedback targeting alpha-wave production and sensorimotor rhythm training produced significant improvements in PTSD symptoms, affect regulation, and executive function in chronically traumatized individuals.

The logic is elegant from an engineering perspective. If traumatic brains show characteristic electrical patterns — excessive high-frequency beta activity (hypervigilance), deficient alpha activity (inability to relax), and dysregulated theta-beta ratios — then directly training the brain to produce healthier patterns should address the problem at the hardware level, bypassing the language and cognition layers entirely.

Van der Kolk’s neurofeedback studies showed changes not just in symptoms but in brain connectivity patterns visible on functional MRI. The brain was physically reorganizing in response to the training. This is neuroplasticity — the brain’s capacity to rewire itself — harnessed deliberately for trauma recovery.

The Social Brain and the Cost of Disconnection

One of van der Kolk’s most profound insights concerns the social nature of trauma and recovery. Trauma is not just about what happened to you. It is about what happened to your relationships — your capacity to trust, to connect, to feel safe with other human beings.

The brain’s social engagement system, as described by Stephen Porges’ polyvagal theory (which van der Kolk championed early and often), depends on the ventral vagal complex — the myelinated vagus nerve that regulates the muscles of the face, voice, and middle ear. When this system is functioning well, humans can read facial expressions, modulate vocal tone, listen selectively, and engage in the reciprocal dance of social interaction.

Trauma — especially early relational trauma — damages this system. The traumatized individual loses the capacity to read social cues accurately (facial expressions look threatening), to modulate their own voice (they speak in a flat or guarded tone), to listen effectively (the middle ear muscles shift tuning toward low-frequency threat sounds rather than the human voice frequency range), and to engage in genuine social reciprocity.

The result is isolation. And isolation, van der Kolk emphasizes, is not merely a consequence of trauma — it is the perpetuating factor. Humans are social animals whose nervous systems are designed to be regulated by other nervous systems. Infants regulate their physiology through co-regulation with caregivers. Adults maintain autonomic balance through social connection, physical touch, and the experience of being seen and heard.

When trauma severs the capacity for connection, the individual loses access to the primary healing mechanism that evolution built into the human design. They are isolated with a dysregulated nervous system, unable to receive the relational input that would help that system re-regulate.

This is why van der Kolk places such emphasis on group modalities — theater, group yoga, martial arts, choir — as trauma treatments. These activities rebuild the social engagement system by creating structured, low-stakes opportunities for synchronized activity with other humans. They are not merely recreational. They are neurobiological interventions that target the specific circuits damaged by trauma.

The Body Keeps the Score and Shamanic Tradition

What is remarkable about van der Kolk’s work, viewed from the perspective of traditional healing, is how precisely it maps to what indigenous healers have always known.

Shamanic traditions worldwide have understood that trauma does not just affect the mind — it affects the body and the spirit. The Quechua-speaking healers of the Andes describe hucha — heavy energy that accumulates in the body from unprocessed experiences. The Siberian shamans speak of soul loss — the departure of a vital essence from the body during overwhelming experience. The Aboriginal Australians describe the shattering of a person’s songline — the energetic thread connecting them to their story, their land, and their people.

Van der Kolk’s description of dissociation — consciousness departing the body during overwhelming trauma — is neuroimaging confirmation of what shamans call soul loss. His observation that traumatic memory lives in the body as fragmented sensory data, inaccessible to language, is the scientific articulation of what energy healers describe as heavy energy or blocked energy trapped in the tissues. His emphasis on body-based, right-brain, non-verbal healing modalities is a return to the somatic, rhythmic, communal healing practices that indigenous cultures have employed for millennia.

The drumming circle, the sweat lodge, the ceremonial dance — these are not primitive substitutes for psychotherapy. They are sophisticated neurobiological interventions that engage the body, the right hemisphere, the subcortical brain, and the social engagement system simultaneously. They do what van der Kolk’s research says effective trauma treatment must do: reach below language, below cognition, into the body where the score is actually kept.

The Implications: Trauma as a Consciousness Problem

Van der Kolk’s work, taken to its logical conclusion, reframes trauma as a consciousness problem, not merely a medical one.

Trauma is the fragmentation of consciousness. It splits experience from awareness, body from mind, present from past. The traumatized individual is not fully here — part of their consciousness is still trapped in the moment of overwhelm, re-experiencing it in fragments, unable to integrate it into a coherent narrative of self.

Healing trauma, therefore, is fundamentally a consciousness restoration project. It requires reassembling the fragments — bringing body awareness back online, reconnecting the right and left hemispheres, restoring the prefrontal cortex’s capacity to contextualize experience in time, rebuilding the social engagement system’s capacity for connection, and reintegrating the exiled parts of self that departed during overwhelming experience.

This is not a job for a single modality. It requires what van der Kolk’s career has demonstrated through four decades of research: a comprehensive, multimodal approach that honors the body as the primary site of traumatic encoding, relationships as the primary vehicle of healing, and consciousness as the integrating force that makes wholeness possible.

The body keeps the score. But the body can also release the score — when we learn to listen to it, work with it, and trust the wisdom encoded in its responses. The body is not the enemy. It is the faithful record-keeper that has been waiting, patiently, for someone to ask it what it knows.

Van der Kolk’s revolutionary contribution is giving us the scientific language and neuroimaging evidence to understand what the body has been trying to tell us all along: that healing happens not by overriding the body with the mind, but by reuniting them — restoring the dialogue between the animal body that survived and the conscious awareness that can finally make meaning of what happened.

That reunion — body, mind, and awareness — is the definition of integration. And integration is the definition of healing.