REST Research and Clinical Evidence: The Science of Floating

Language: en

---

From Sensory Deprivation to Restricted Environmental Stimulation

For decades, the isolation tank suffered from a branding problem. The term “sensory deprivation” conjured images of torture, brainwashing, and psychological distress — Cold War experiments designed to break the mind rather than expand it. This association was not entirely unearned: in the 1950s and 1960s, the CIA’s MKUltra program and related military research programs did investigate sensory deprivation as a tool for interrogation and coercion.

In the 1970s and 1980s, psychologist Peter Suedfeld at the University of British Columbia set out to rescue the science of flotation from its association with coercive methods. He renamed the field REST — Restricted Environmental Stimulation Technique — and initiated a rigorous, methodical research program that would demonstrate the therapeutic benefits of floating with scientific precision.

Suedfeld’s insight was that “sensory deprivation” was a misnomer. The float tank does not deprive the senses. It reduces environmental stimulation to a minimum, allowing the brain’s own resources to redirect from processing external noise to internal processing, self-repair, and restoration. The difference is not semantic. It reflects a fundamental shift in understanding: the tank is not taking something away from the brain. It is giving the brain something back — the processing power it normally spends on managing the constant barrage of sensory input.

The clinical evidence that has accumulated since Suedfeld’s early work is now substantial, spanning chronic pain, anxiety, depression, hypertension, stress-related disorders, addiction, creativity, and learning. Floating is one of the most thoroughly studied complementary therapies in the scientific literature, and the evidence consistently supports its efficacy across a wide range of conditions.

The Meta-Analytic Evidence

In 2005, Suedfeld and Arreed Barabasz published a comprehensive review of REST research in the journal International Journal of Stress Management. Their analysis covered several decades of studies and established the following evidence base:

Pain reduction. Multiple studies demonstrated that floating produces significant reductions in chronic pain, including muscle tension pain, headache, and fibromyalgia-related pain. The mechanisms include reduced muscle tension (the weightless environment eliminates gravitational loading on muscles and joints), reduced cortisol (the primary stress hormone, which amplifies pain perception), and enhanced endorphin release (the body’s natural pain-relieving chemistry).

A 2001 study by Bood and colleagues at Karlstad University in Sweden examined 37 participants with chronic pain conditions (fibromyalgia, muscle tension, whiplash) over 12 sessions of floating. The results showed significant reductions in pain intensity, anxiety, and depression, with benefits maintained at a 4-month follow-up. Pain reduction was not merely subjective: participants showed measurable decreases in blood cortisol and improvements in sleep quality.

Anxiety and stress reduction. The evidence for floating’s anxiolytic effects is among the strongest in the REST literature. A 2018 study by Justin Feinstein and colleagues at the Laureate Institute for Brain Research (LIBR) — published in the journal PLOS ONE — examined the effects of a single float session on 50 participants with clinically significant anxiety. The results were striking: a single float session produced a significant reduction in anxiety that was large in magnitude and clinically meaningful. Participants with the highest baseline anxiety levels showed the greatest improvements.

Feinstein’s study was notable for its rigor: it used validated clinical measures (the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and the PANAS affect scales), included a large sample with diverse anxiety diagnoses (generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, PTSD, panic disorder), and demonstrated effects after just one session.

Blood pressure reduction. Floating produces consistent reductions in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure. A 1984 study by Fine and Turner found that six float sessions over three weeks produced blood pressure reductions comparable to those achieved by medication in mild hypertension. The mechanism involves the combination of parasympathetic nervous system activation (the relaxation response), reduced cortisol, and the vasodilatory effect of transdermal magnesium absorption from the Epsom salt solution.

Depression. While the evidence base for floating and depression is smaller than for anxiety, the available studies are promising. The Feinstein 2018 study found significant reductions in depressive symptoms alongside the anxiety reductions. A Swedish study by Kjellgren and colleagues found that 12 sessions of floating over 7 weeks produced significant reductions in depression severity in participants with clinical depression, with effects maintained at follow-up.

The Laureate Institute for Brain Research: Modern Float Neuroscience

The most rigorous modern research on floating is being conducted at the Laureate Institute for Brain Research (LIBR) in Tulsa, Oklahoma, under the direction of Justin Feinstein — a clinical neuropsychologist who has made floating a central focus of his research program.

Feinstein’s research is distinguished by its use of neuroimaging and physiological monitoring alongside subjective reports, providing a multidimensional picture of what floating does to the brain and body.

The Standardized Pool (LIBR-designed float environment). Feinstein’s team designed a custom float pool for research purposes — larger and more comfortable than commercial float pods, with integrated physiological monitoring equipment (heart rate, skin conductance, respiratory rate, blood pressure) and the ability to collect subjective experience reports at precise time points during the float.

Interoceptive awareness. Feinstein’s most significant theoretical contribution has been the connection between floating and interoception — the brain’s perception of internal bodily signals (heartbeat, breathing, gut sensations, muscle tension). Feinstein has demonstrated that floating dramatically enhances interoceptive awareness: in the absence of external stimulation, the brain becomes exquisitely sensitive to internal signals that are normally below the threshold of conscious awareness.

This enhanced interoception has profound clinical implications. Alexithymia — the inability to identify and describe one’s own emotional states — is a core feature of many psychiatric conditions, including PTSD, eating disorders, and personality disorders. If floating enhances interoceptive awareness, it may help individuals reconnect with their bodies and emotions — a therapeutic goal that is central to trauma treatment, somatic psychotherapy, and mindfulness-based interventions.

Anxiety and the body. Feinstein’s research has revealed a paradoxical finding about anxiety and floating: individuals with the most severe anxiety, including those with panic disorder, consistently report that floating produces one of the most profound relaxation experiences they have ever had. This contradicts the intuitive prediction that anxious individuals would find the tank claustrophobic and distressing.

The explanation, Feinstein proposes, is that anxiety is fundamentally a body-based phenomenon — the brain’s response to interoceptive signals of threat (rapid heartbeat, shallow breathing, muscle tension). In the tank, these threat signals are dramatically reduced: heart rate slows, breathing deepens, muscles relax, and the body enters a state of physiological calm that may be unprecedented for chronically anxious individuals. The brain, receiving “all clear” signals from the body for the first time in years, responds with a corresponding reduction in the anxious mental state.

This finding aligns with the polyvagal theory of Stephen Porges, which proposes that anxiety and trauma responses are mediated by the autonomic nervous system and that therapeutic progress requires establishing a felt sense of physiological safety. The float tank may be the most efficient tool ever developed for producing that felt sense of safety — total environmental control, zero threat, and a physiological state that signals “safe” to every regulatory system in the body.

Enhanced Creativity and Learning

The REST research literature includes a substantial body of evidence on floating’s cognitive effects:

Creativity. Suedfeld’s research demonstrated enhanced creative thinking following float sessions, as measured by standardized creativity tests (Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking, Remote Associates Test). The enhancement was not merely subjective — participants produced objectively more creative responses (as rated by blind judges) after floating compared to control conditions.

The mechanism likely involves the combination of theta brainwave dominance (associated with associative, non-linear thinking), reduced prefrontal cortex activity (which normally constrains creative thought through critical evaluation), and enhanced default mode network activity (which generates spontaneous mental imagery and novel associations).

Learning and academic performance. A series of studies by Taylor and colleagues in the 1980s and 1990s demonstrated that floating combined with audio recordings of study material produced enhanced learning compared to study alone. The effect was attributed to the theta-dominant state produced by floating, which facilitates memory encoding and consolidation.

A 1987 study by Taylor found that college students who floated while listening to recorded lectures performed significantly better on subsequent exams than students who simply listened to the same lectures in a quiet room. The floating enhanced both factual recall and conceptual understanding.

Athletic performance. Several studies have demonstrated that floating enhances athletic performance, likely through a combination of enhanced recovery (reduced muscle tension, improved sleep), improved body awareness (enhanced proprioception and interoception), and facilitated mental rehearsal (the theta state allows vivid visualization of athletic movements).

A study of basketball players at a university found that those who combined float sessions with mental rehearsal of free-throw shooting improved their shooting percentage significantly more than those who practiced mental rehearsal alone or those who only physically practiced.

Addiction Treatment

Peter Suedfeld’s research included investigations into floating as an adjunctive treatment for addiction, with promising results:

Smoking cessation. Multiple studies demonstrated that REST, combined with anti-smoking messages delivered during float sessions, produced significantly higher quit rates than the anti-smoking messages alone or standard cessation programs. The enhanced efficacy was attributed to the heightened suggestibility and reduced defensive barriers associated with the float state — the same reduced critical filtering that makes the theta state conducive to creativity also makes it conducive to therapeutic suggestion.

Alcohol reduction. Preliminary studies showed reduced alcohol consumption following float programs, with participants reporting decreased craving and increased awareness of the emotional triggers underlying their drinking behavior. The enhanced interoceptive awareness produced by floating may help individuals with addiction recognize the bodily signals (craving, tension, emotional distress) that normally trigger substance use outside of conscious awareness.

The Physiological Profile of Floating

The research literature has established a consistent physiological profile of what happens in the body during a float session:

Cardiovascular. Heart rate decreases by approximately 10-20 beats per minute. Blood pressure decreases by approximately 10-20 mmHg systolic and 5-10 mmHg diastolic. These reductions are clinically significant and comparable to the effects of anti-hypertensive medication.

Endocrine. Cortisol (the primary stress hormone) decreases significantly. Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), which stimulates cortisol production, also decreases. These reductions indicate a downregulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis — the body’s central stress-response system. Endorphin levels increase, contributing to pain relief and the sense of well-being consistently reported by float participants.

Muscular. Electromyographic (EMG) studies demonstrate significant reductions in muscle tension during floating — including muscles that are chronically contracted in conditions like fibromyalgia, tension headache, and TMJ disorder. The weightless environment allows muscles to fully release, often for the first time in years.

Neurological. EEG studies demonstrate a shift from beta-dominant brainwave patterns (associated with ordinary waking consciousness, analytical thinking, and stress) to theta-dominant patterns (associated with deep relaxation, creativity, hypnagogic imagery, and meditative states). This shift occurs within 20-40 minutes for most participants and deepens over the course of a typical 60-90 minute session.

Autonomic. Skin conductance (a measure of sympathetic nervous system activation) decreases, while heart rate variability (HRV) — a measure of parasympathetic tone and autonomic flexibility — increases. This indicates a shift from the stress-reactive sympathetic state to the restorative parasympathetic state.

Dose-Response and Long-Term Effects

The research suggests a dose-response relationship: while single float sessions produce measurable acute benefits, regular floating (weekly or biweekly) produces cumulative benefits that exceed what single sessions achieve.

Bood’s 2006 study tracked participants over 12 float sessions and found that the benefits accumulated progressively — each session deepened the relaxation response, reduced pain further, and improved mood more than the previous session. This suggests a training effect: the brain learns to enter the float state more readily with practice, and the therapeutic benefits compound over time.

Long-term follow-up studies (4-6 months post-intervention) have shown that the benefits of a float program persist well beyond the last session, suggesting that floating produces lasting changes in the brain’s stress-response set point — a re-calibration of the autonomic nervous system from chronic sympathetic activation (stress) to parasympathetic dominance (restoration).

The Current State of the Evidence

The clinical evidence for floating is substantial but still developing. The strongest evidence supports:

• Significant anxiety reduction (multiple high-quality studies, large effect sizes)
• Chronic pain reduction (multiple studies with follow-up)
• Blood pressure reduction (consistent findings across studies)
• Stress hormone reduction (cortisol, ACTH — consistent findings)
• Enhanced creativity and cognitive flexibility (multiple studies)
• Muscle tension reduction (consistent EMG findings)

Areas where the evidence is promising but still emerging include:

• Depression treatment
• PTSD treatment
• Addiction treatment
• Athletic performance enhancement
• Enhanced learning and memory

The field needs more large-scale randomized controlled trials, longer follow-up periods, and research with diverse populations. Feinstein’s ongoing research program at LIBR is addressing many of these gaps, and the coming decade is likely to see a substantial expansion of the evidence base.

What the existing evidence already demonstrates is that floating is not placebo, not pseudoscience, and not merely pleasant relaxation. It is a physiologically active intervention that produces measurable changes in brain function, hormonal profiles, cardiovascular function, and muscular tension — changes that are clinically significant and therapeutically relevant.

The float tank is not a luxury. It is a medical device. The science says so.

---

This article reviews the clinical research on flotation REST. Key references include Suedfeld and Barabasz’s meta-analytic review, Feinstein et al.’s 2018 PLOS ONE anxiety study, Bood et al.’s chronic pain research at Karlstad University, Fine and Turner’s 1984 blood pressure study, Taylor’s learning enhancement studies, and the ongoing research program at the Laureate Institute for Brain Research.